THE STORY THAT UNITES US… Part Eight: The Elephant in the Room

Yes, we are going here. We have to. Our goal is to uncover The Invisible Forces and the games they are playing. We have already learned many of their tools and techniques. Now it is time to put them all together. We are going to talk about Big Pharma and the vaccines.

Just to be clear, my goal is not to influence anyone to take, or not take the vaccine. This is a choice that should be made by each individual in alignment with their own logic and guidance. My goal is to highlight some important issues that may not be getting adequate exposure.

So far, I hope The Story has been thought provoking. I think I have given everyone something to agree with, something to disagree with and hopefully something to think more about.  

As you know, sometimes ‘thought provoking’ requires work to fight through our triggers. Whatever is coming up for you, I do hope you power through. For my part I will do my very best to articulate what needs to be said to give us all the opportunity to see beyond the filter of propaganda to the workings of The Invisible Powers.

Corporate Personhood, the topic of Part Seven, was the focus of media propaganda targeted towards the political right about 6 years ago when campaigns to reverse corporate personhood were going strong. While the virus and vaccines are currently the topic of immense media propaganda directed to the political left, but successfully inflaming both sides.

And perhaps a word of clarification is needed here. Propaganda is a tool of those with Big-Money, and Big Pharma is Big Money. Propaganda always has as its target, those who are in the way of their goals. It should be the duty of everyone to question, what are their goals? What are we giving up on the way to achieving those goals?

First, let’s acknowledge together that the Coronavirus is obviously real and causing great harm. Harm from the vaccine is also real and causing great harm. One side’s media highlights the increase in deaths from the virus and the other side’s media highlights the deaths from the vaccine. The end result is that all of us are being bombarded with fear from all directions. We are doing our best to navigate these critical times, so let’s intend to be gentle with one another.

We have talked about the games The Invisible Powers have played through our history, enough to recognize them when they are in play. But just recognizing the fingerprints is not enough. The next layer we have to challenge is our own belief system.

Never underestimate the power of a belief. You can successfully navigate through triggers, through logic and see that it looks, smells and acts like a game of The Invisible Powers, only to get to the end and come up smack dab against a belief and revert to ‘But I just can’t believe it’. So, be aware as we go forward.

POLITICAL PRESENCE

I think one of the first questions we must ask ourselves is why is the issue of safety in our vaccines even politicized? It should be clear that 100% of Americans want safe vaccines! The question it seems, is how do we get them?

Next, we must ask ourselves is why does the pharmaceutical industry need political expenditures? If the industry is providing a critical service for humanity, backed by rigorous science that speaks for itself, political expenditures don’t make sense. Right?

But the pharmaceutical industry was the largest lobbyist in 2019 in Washington DC, spending $295 million dollars, almost twice as much as the second largest lobbyist. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/257364/top-lobbying-industries-in-the-us/)

So, let’s look at those expenditures from the other perspective. Big Pharma is a for-profit business, on the edge of big expansion, their vaccines protected by legislation giving them immunity from liability, without the rigorous testing necessary for drugs, it makes sense they would need political support. Their business model requires it.

LEGAL LIABILITY – PHARMACEUTICALS

The next question we must ask ourselves is what is the pharmaceutical industry’s track record in terms of providing ethical, safe and effective medicines to the public? After all, this is not a new industry, we do have the benefit of historical data.

We may be tempted to think that yes, I know the pharmaceutical industry seems to trip over itself from time to time, but they really do try to provide us with safe and tested medicines.

The following is a summary of the top five legal settlements provided at https://www.enjuris.com/blog/resources/largest-pharmaceutical-settlements-lawsuits/

• 2012. GlaxoSmithKline. $3 billion. Criminal + Civil fines. The penalties are related to deceptive marketing, off-label promotion, kickbacks and failure to report safety data.
• 2009. Pfizer. $2.3 billion. Criminal + Civil fines. The penalties are related to false claims and kickbacks to doctors.
• 2013. Johnson and Johnson. $2.2 billion. Criminal + Civil fines. The penalties were for off-label marketing.
• 2012. Abbott. $1.5 billion. Criminal + Civil fines. The penalties were for off-label marketing.
• 2009. Eli Lilly. $1.42 billion. Criminal + Civil fines. The penalties were for off-label marketing.

And then again, we may have to acknowledge that these are huge fines that also had criminal components. This makes one wonder, are these fines just a cost of doing business?

This means, our loved ones went to their trusted doctor for relief from an illness. They did not know that the drug they were prescribed had safety problems that were not reported. They did not know that it may not even be approved for their condition. They did not know their doctor may be receiving a kick-back for prescribing that drug. They just trusted. We all should wonder, did the misuse of these drugs cause our loved one greater pain, suffering or even death?

Yes, we already know what it looks like when they do have liability.

LEGAL LIABILITY – VACCINES

But vaccines are identified as biologics and not under the same rules as pharmaceutical drugs. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 was passed by Congress in response to the numerous lawsuits the vaccine makers were receiving for injury and death from their vaccines. This in itself is admission that vaccines are inherently risky and could result in death.

Propaganda side note: Words for positive image are clearly at work here. The slogan for vaccines is ‘safe and effective’. Even though the vaccine makers were not willing to take financial liability for the risk of their product, we are expected to take the human risk of their product.

They also set up a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) funded by an excise tax on vaccines, so vaccine injured patients could receive compensation. So far $4 billion dollars has been paid out of that fund.

PROPAGANDA – FIRST ATTACK THE MOTHERS

A couple of years ago when I was advocating for vaccine safety in our state’s capital in Olympia, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr spoke and had what I considered to be a powerful quote:

“When…

Congress has been bought,

Regulatory agencies are part of the problem,

Media is greedy for advertising revenues,

Scientific studies have been manipulated,            

Education reinforces ‘the system’,

Lawyers can’t sue,

Our children’s last line of defense are the Mothers”

He was speaking to a couple of thousand people, mostly mothers of vaccine injured children. Keep in mind, these mothers at one time were pro-vaccine, but due to injuries from the vaccine were now the courageous advocates for their children and the safety of vaccines for others.

The propaganda lens was turned to attack the mothers of disabled kids. Attacking them. Making them out to be the ignorant ones. And many of us supported that.

PROPAGANDA – THEN CENSOR AND ATTACK THE WHISTLEBLOWERS

Our country was built upon the tenets of democracy. For that democracy to function, we must support and accommodate a civil debate of the issues. This should especially include something as important as vaccine science.

Did you ever expect to see so many Americans supporting censorship? Perhaps it is more palatable when it is called ‘vaccine mis-information’. Let us not forget that one of the important tenets of propaganda is to attack any opposition to the desired image. Immediately, publicly and ruthlessly.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, recently the target of censorship, says it well:

02/11/21

BIG PHARMA › NEWS

RFK, Jr. Responds to Instagram’s Removal of His Account

RFK, Jr.’s Instagram account was deplatformed Wednesday. Dozens of media outlets reported the censorship, saying the account was removed over “vaccine misinformation,” a characterization Kennedy unequivocally rejected.

By  Children’s Health Defense Team

“© [02/11/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense, said:

On February 11, 2021, Robert F. Kennedy and Del BigTree’s instagram accounts were removed without notice 15 minutes before airing a video “Covid Vaccine on Trial: If you only knew”. The reason was purportedly due to vaccine mis-information.  Kennedy, founder, chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense,” unequivocally rejects those characterizations as false and misleading.

“Every statement I put on Instagram was sourced from a government database, from peer-reviewed publications and from carefully confirmed news stories. None of my posts were false. Facebook, the pharmaceutical industry and its captive regulators use the term ‘vaccine misinformation’ as a euphemism for any factual assertion that departs from official pronouncements about vaccine health and safety, whether true or not. This kind of censorship is counterproductive if our objective is a safe and effective vaccine supply.

“The pharmaceutical industry is hastily creating vaccines using taxpayer money and untested technologies. These include a rash of risky new products that are exempt from liability, from long-term safety testing and that have not received FDA approval. Emergency Use Authorization is a mass population scientific experiment. If it has any prayer of working, it will require extraordinary scrutiny from the press and the public.

“Instead, the mainstream media and social media giants are imposing a totalitarian censorship to prevent public health advocates, like myself, from voicing concerns and from engaging in civil informed debate in the public square. They are punishing, shaming, vilifying, gaslighting and abolishing individuals who report their own vaccine injuries.

“Anyone can see that this is a formula for catastrophe and a coup d’état against the First Amendment, the foundation stone of American democracy.”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. founder, chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense,”.

So I ask, who nowis our last line of defense?

The following is a very interesting presentation from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on some of the important issues with vaccines, scientific testing, regulators and vaccine manufacturers.

THE VACCINE SAFETY PROJECT

Excerpts from The Vaccine Safety Project Transcript

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense

http://www.childrenshealthdefense.org

“© [02/11/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

This entire transcript is available at www.childrenshealthdefense.org.

Presented by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

… I want vaccines that are as safe as possible, I want science that is robust and I want to make sure that we have a regulatory agency that has unquestioned integrity and freedom of conflicts of interest and we don’t have those things today.

*********

…But my question was, how did those neurotoxic elements get into our vaccine supply? What kind of testing was done? The answers to that investigation were shocking to me and I believe that they will be shocking to any pediatrician, any public health regulator, and any politician who is now considering vaccine I’m going to start by talking about this study that was published in February of 2017, of this year.

One of the leaders of the team is Dr. Peter Aaby. Dr. Aaby is one of the world’s foremost authorities on vaccines, particularly vaccines in Africa.

This study was a study of the DTP vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, the most popular vaccine in the world and a vaccine that’s given to virtually every vaccinated child in Africa.

Because of a quirk in the way that the vaccines were administered in the nation of Guinea-Bissau, it allowed Dr. Aaby and his team to do the kind of study vaccine safety advocates in this country have advocated for many, many years.

It is a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study and what they found was the vaccinated children had 10 times the death rate of unvaccinated children.

But the things that the vaccinated children were dying of, were things you would never associate with vaccines.

What the scientists concluded was that the vaccine, while it was protecting children from diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, had wrecked their immune system so that they were dying of these unrelated illnesses.

And here’s what they concluded, “All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.”

This is rather shocking. The interesting thing and the frightening thing about this study is that this was data that was 30 years old. Nobody noticed that this vaccine had been killing 10 times the number of kids.

And the relevant question for us, this study begs, is there a surveillance system in this country that would send off an alarm if the same thing was happening here from our current vaccine program? Or is there a safety testing program that would assure that this can’t happen? And the answer, I’m about to show you, is no.

I’m going to start with this slide, and this slide shows a short list of vaccine adverse events. In other words, these are injuries that are acknowledged by the government and by the manufacturer to be caused by vaccines.

How do we know that? Well, this first list above the blue line are injuries that have been compensated by the Vaccine Court. So the courts have decided yes, your injury was caused by the vaccine and we are going to pay you money for that.

These include autoimmune diseases, encephalopathy, that is brain damage, seizure disorder, death. Below the line is another list that really overlaps with the top list.

These are the injuries that the manufacturer is saying, “These could be caused by our vaccine.” And they include autoimmune diseases, asthma, eczema, juvenile diabetes.

Now look at this, according to the CDC one in six children now has a developmental disorder. The same injuries associated with vaccines.

This is an epidemic. And according to HHS, it gets worse. 54% of children have some kind of chronic illness.

In 1986, Congress passed the Vaccine Act and gave blanket immunity to vaccine companies for injuries caused by vaccines. And for some of these new vaccines, they can make up to a billion dollars a year in profits or even more.

This is what happened, in 1986 there were 11 vaccines on the schedule, but today there are 53 jabs.

Look what happened at the same time, in 1988 only 12.8% of kids had chronic disease, today 54%. So the rise was coterminous with the expansion of the vaccine schedule.

Question one, who is responsible then for vaccine safety? In every other sector in this country, it’s the manufacturer and distributor of the product who is responsible for safety.

With an automobile, it would be the automobile manufacturer, with a drug like Phen-fen or Vioxx, when those drugs were found to be unsafe, the company was responsible.

And, of course, that responsibility and that liability keeps the company concerned and focused on safety.

So this is the language of the Vaccine Act, “No person may bring a civil action against any vaccine “administrator or manufacturer in a State or Federal court “for damages arising from a “vaccine-related injury and death.” So no matter how sloppy the line protocols, no matter how dangerous the ingredient, no matter how grievous the injury to your child, you can’t sue the manufacturer for an injury caused by vaccines.

So what are the consequences to having the only consumer product in America that’s completely liability-free? First of all, there’s no incentive among manufacturers to conduct safety studies.

In fact, there’s a disincentive because there’s a provision in the Vaccine Act that says essentially that the only way that a manufacturer can be liable is if they know of a side effect from that vaccine and they fail to warn. So their incentive is to do everything that they can to not learn of any side effects.

That’s one consequence. The second is that there’s a liability-free market of 74 million American children. The third is that there is a very strong incentive to develop more and more and more vaccines because the profits are so enormous and the costs are almost nothing.

Here are the results in detail, 11 vaccines in 1986. Fifty-three vaccines that our children are being given today under the schedule, and here’s the future: 270 vaccines that are already in the pipeline.

Thousands of clinical trials that are developing new vaccines for the industry and a vaccine industry that is projecting vaccines as a $90 billion profit center over the next few years.

So, if the manufacturers have been lifted of any responsibility for vaccine safety, well, who’s responsible?

Well, the Vaccine Act did not want to leave a vacuum. So it said that HHS is responsible, Health and Human Services Department and that specifically FDA, CDC, NIH and HRSA would be the agencies responsible. There’s two stages before a vaccine comes to market.

First, the FDA has to license the vaccine. Then CDC has to add it to the schedule. The FDA is the agency that is in charge of the initial step of licensing the vaccine, and here’s what FDA says that it does.

It says, “Vaccines undergo rigorous and extensive testing “to determine their safety.” Is that true? Let’s see. Let’s first look at what FDA requires for regular drugs.

Now, for most other drugs, the safety testing is, indeed, rigorous and that kind of testing takes several thousand people who are given the drug and then the same number of people who, usually similarly situated people, who are given a pill that looks exactly like that drug but it’s inert and neither the researchers nor the patients know which ones got the saline drug and which ones got the real drug, so it’s double blind.

Then the researchers look at both of those groups for typically five years and they look at health outcomes and that’s how they figure out whether or not the drug is safe.

For example, with Lipitor the safety review period was 4.8 years and the placebo group received a sugar pill that looked exactly like a Lipitor pill.

With Enbrel, which is another prescription drug, the safety review period was 6.6 years, and the placebo group was a saline injection.

But look what they do with vaccines.

Vaccines are characterized by FDA not as drugs, but as biologics, and that gives FDA the capacity to fast track them without all of that rigorous and bothersome testing.

These are the two hepatitis B vaccines that are the only two that are approved for one day old children.

So these vaccines are given to virtually every child that’s born in this country in a hospital today.

Here was the safety review period, four days.

That means if a baby had a seizure and died on the fifth day, it never happened, it wouldn’t ever be reported, no one will ever know because they only look at them for four days.

This one got five days. And then, look at this, there was no placebo.

So what are they measuring it against? How do they even tell whether the test group had an unusual number of illnesses unless there’s a placebo group to test them against? Of course they can’t, it’s not real safety science.

Yet, this is the only testing that these vaccines received, so whoever approved these vaccines was not making an evidence-based decision. They were making a decision based upon something else.

Here’s the polio vaccine for two-month-old children, the safety review was 48 hours. Look at the placebo group, they tested against the DTP vaccine. This is the vaccine that was causing so many injuries that it caused Congress to pass the Vaccine Act because manufacturers were saying, “We’re getting sued so much that we’re going to “go out of business.” That’s not real science.

That’s not a placebo, that’s what we call a spiked placebo. A placebo where you’re using something toxic.

Here’s some more examples, these are the Hib vaccines. And here are the safety review periods.

This got the longest one, the Sanofi Pasteur version got 30 days, the others got four days and three days respectively.

But look what they were tested against, not a placebo. This one was tested against six vaccines at the same time.

That’s not going to tell you anything about the safety of this vaccine prior to licensing, which means that the only thing that we’re left with to determine whether vaccines are safe or not are post-licensing surveillance studies.

And what I’m going to show you is that the post-licensing surveillance is next to worthless.

The central mechanism for post-licensing vaccine safety surveillance is called the VAERS system, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.

VAERS last year alone said that 59,117 Americans were injured by vaccines and that doesn’t tell the whole story.

According to HHS, this number represents fewer than 1% of adverse events which are reported.

What would it look like if we were actually capturing all vaccine injuries? According to HHS’s own calculations, it would be close to six million Americans injured by vaccines every year. And in 2010, the HHS actually commissioned a study that confirmed these astronomical levels of vaccine injury.

The HHS wanted to determine whether or not it was feasible to automate the VAERS system, so they hired an outside consulting group who came in and automated a system for one of the HMOs.

What they found, when they looked at how many people were actually getting injured, a true number, not reported by volunteers, but taken from medical records, of the 376,452 individuals who were vaccinated, 35,000 of them had some kind of adverse reaction. That’s one in ten.

That’s very, very far from the one in a million number that the industry commonly uses when it talks about vaccine injury.

And it’s a number that most public health officials and most Americans would consider completely unacceptable.

What happened to this system? Did HHS and CDC say, “This is science “that the public needs to know about, “so that we can ensure the safety of the vaccine supply?” No, they did the opposite.

They literally stopped answering the phone calls for those consultants.

The consultant says, “Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available.” So, instead of expanding the system nationwide, they shut it down.

They simply stopped answering the phone. These consultants had bad news and they didn’t want to hear it.

Understandably there’s going to be a lot of people out there who are going to want to dismiss what Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. says about the adequacy or inadequacy of vaccine safety science at HHS.

But it’s not just me saying that, this is what the Institute of Medicine says about vaccine safety science at HHS.

The Institute of Medicine, IOM, top scientists in the country, who are brought together to review the vaccine safety science at HHS.

This is their job, these are very prestigious individuals and they’re paid for by the Federal government.

Here’s what IOM says, in 1991, IOM reviewed a single vaccine, the DTP vaccine They found that there were 22 injuries or diseases that had been reported to be caused by that vaccine.

Of those 22, the existing literature, the scientific literature, supported causation in six of them. Existing literature acknowledged that six of those diseases were, in fact, caused by the DTP.

With four of those diseases, the literature rejected causation. But look at this number, with 12 of those diseases, there was no literature. It had never been studied.

And what kind of disease are we talking about? Meningitis, neurological damage, learning disabilities, and autoimmune diseases.

Because of the lack of science, they were handicapped in being able to make any kind of assessment about whether this vaccine was dangerous or safe.

So that was 1991, but look what happened three years later.

In 1994, IOM came back and looked at four other vaccines, they found that there were 54 illnesses that had been reported to be associated with those vaccines.

But for 38, there was no literature. It simply had never been studied.

So, the IOM here is saying, “We don’t have “the ability to assess the safety of vaccines “because the science simply doesn’t exist.” 17 years later, in 2011, IOM came back again. This time they reviewed four other vaccines, 155 conditions were reported.

For 134 we don’t know, and nobody knows, if the vaccines are causing that epidemic because we don’t have the science to reject that hypothesis.

IOM’s report was extensive and it was a 700-page report and I selected this because this deals with an injury that we’ve all heard about and that there’s a lot of controversy about, which is autism.

This page was looking at whether the DTP vaccine can cause autism.

And what they found at the end of that is that, the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between DTP and autism.

So what they’re saying here is that they couldn’t find any study of the relationship between DTP and autism, but in fact, they acknowledge in the first paragraph, they did find that there was one study out there, but that study found that DTP does cause autism.

But IOM decided to reject that study because it provided data from a passive surveillance system and lacked an unvaccinated comparison population.

Well, that system that it relied on, was the VAERS system. It’s HHS’s own system.

What IOM is saying here is HHS is so slovenly and reckless at gathering data on vaccine safety that we cannot use the one system that they have because it’s so unreliable.

So what does CDC do with this information? Do they come clean with the American public? Does it say to the American public, “We need to do our job.

“We need to go out and commission these studies “and find out whether there are any associations “between DTaP vaccine and autism?” No, this is what they do.

This is CDC’s website: Vaccines do not cause autism.

And what does it cite? A 2011 Institute of Medicine study, this study.

CDC is counting on the fact that nobody is going to go out and read the 700-page report that it’s citing there and find out that’s not what the report says at all.

This is a lie. Now I want you to watch a 2008 interview with Dr. Bernadine Healy who was the former head of NIH.

*****

“I haven’t seen major studies that focus on 300 kids who got autistic symptoms within a period of a few weeks of a vaccine.

I think that the public health officials have been too quick to dismiss the hypothesis as irrational without sufficient studies of causation.

The reason why they didn’t want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they’re afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that would scare the public away”.

Reporter: It sounds like you don’t think the hypothesis of a link between vaccines and autism is completely irrational.

Healy: So when I first heard about it, I thought that doesn’t make sense to me.

The more you delve into it, if you look at the basic science, if you look at the research that’s been done on animals, if you also look at some of these individual cases and if you look at the evidence that there is no link, what I come away with is the question has not been answered”.

So as you just heard, Dr. Healy’s central point is that, if we really want to know the safety profile of individual vaccines and the vaccine schedule, there’s one study that we need in order to do that.

That is a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study.

But despite Dr. Healy’s call for that in 2008, by 2013 the Institute of Medicine found that studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have never been conducted.

The good news is that CDC has the database with a capacity to do that study.

The CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink has the health records and the vaccination records of 10 million people including hundreds of thousands of children.

In 2011, IOM said, “It is possible to make this comparison “through analysis of patient information contained “in large databases such as the VSD.” And why is the CDC not conducting these obvious kind of studies? Well, maybe it’s because they don’t like the results when those kind of studies are conducted.

For example, in the African study that I opened this presentation with, where vaccinated kids had 10 times the death rate of unvaccinated kids, or this study that was done in April of this year, and it’s a study of about 700 homeschool kids ages 6 to 12.

The study found that the vaccinated children had less chicken pox and less pertussis, but that they had 30 times the levels of allergic rhinitis as unvaccinated children.

3.9 times the allergies. ADD 4.2 times. Autism 4.2 times.

For this study that was published in 2012, which was a randomized study that compared children who received placebo to those who received a flu shot. What they found was that the flu shot group and the placebo group, had the same rate of flu infections.

But again, the flu shot group had 4.4 times higher rate of non-influenza infection So the flu shot was not giving the children protection against the flu, but it was influencing in a bad way, their immune systems to make them much more vulnerable to other illnesses.

This is a CDC study that was done in 1999 secretly of its own vaccine safety database. What they found was astonishing.

It looked at children who had received thimerosal vaccines and compared those to children who had not and what they found was that kids who had received the thimerosal vaccine had 1100% greater risk of receiving an autism diagnosis.

For comparison, smoking one pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years will create a relative risk of for lung cancer. This was 11.35.

CDC never published this version of the study, never let the public know about these risks and effectively closed the vaccine safety database to almost any independent researcher.

Now that study was known as the Verstraeten study and after that study came out, CDC panicked and began producing numerous studies in-house.

Those studies are almost all epidemiological studies and in my line of business, which is environmental law, epidemiological studies are regarded as the weakest form of studies.

We have an old saying that says, “Statistics don’t lie, “but statisticians do.” You could make an epidemiological study that proves, for example, that sex doesn’t make you pregnant.

How do you do that? You get rid of all the pregnant people before you study the population.

And then you can have a population where a lot of people are having sex and none is getting pregnant and you can prove that sex doesn’t make you pregnant.

That’s one of the gimmicks that CDC used in creating this new wave of epidemiological studies.

*****

Finally, I would like to leave you with the following important reference tool.

What Does a “Safe and Effective” Vaccine Look Like?

by Children’s Health Defense

“© [02/11/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Hundreds of doctors and scientists have studied vaccines, their ingredients, and the physiological mechanisms affected by those ingredients. The following criteria, and the rationale for these criteria, are the results of their work. Vaccine industry spokespeople say vaccines are safe and effective. But are they?

A vaccine should be tested against a true placebo (inert saline).

Prescription drugs are required to be safety tested against a placebo. However, vaccines fall under the category of “biologics” and are usually not tested against an inert saline placebo. For example, Merck’s HPV vaccine was tested against a dangerous aluminum adjuvant, which can trigger autoimmune disorders.

A safe vaccine should be tested long enough to properly track adverse events including those discovered in post-approval surveillance.

Known adverse events like autoimmune, neuro-developmental, and chronic conditions can take months or years to be detected. Yet, most vaccines are monitored for side effects for a period of only two to five days, as stated on the vaccine insert literature. As an example, Merck’s hepatitis B Vaccine, given to one-day-old infants, was only safety tested for five days.

Experimental mRNA and DNA gene technologies should undergo years of testing before being used on the public.

This mechanism of action for a vaccine has never before been ap­proved. There should be a minimum of 10 years of careful research before any such technology is used on a wide scale basis on the public. DNA vaccines are designed to make permanent changes to an individual’s DNA. mRNA vaccines have an inflammatory effect and could potentially lead to autoimmune events.

Vaccines should be free of mercury, aluminum and nano-metals.

Hundreds of peer-reviewed studies prove mercury is not safe. There are no safety studies that show that it is safe when used in vaccines. Although mercury was removed from most vaccines, it is still present in multi-dose vial presentations of the flu vaccine. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin which can induce neurodevelop­mental disorders, brain inflammation, and autoimmune conditions. A two month-old child receives a single-day dose of aluminum that exceeds the FDA’s maximum allowable dose by more than 50 times.

Vaccines should be free of adjuvants proven to be dangerous, including but not limited to squalene, aluminum, and PEG (polyethylene glycol).

An adjuvant is a substance added to a vaccine to elicit a stronger immune response. Squalene, one of many adjuvants used, was found to have harmful effects such as inducing autoimmune conditions and narcolepsy. PEG is another adjuvant that can trigger a serious adverse immune response and result in anaphylaxis (i.e., severe allergic reaction or shock).

Vaccines should be free of bird, cow, pig, monkey and mouse viruses.

Vaccines are often produced in animal serums and can be con­taminated with viruses and retroviruses from other animal species. Many of these viruses, such as SV40 (simian virus 40) that contam­inated some of the early polio vaccines, have been shown to cause cancer in humans.

Vaccines should be free of human DNA and aborted human fetal cell lines.

Human fetal cell lines dating back to the 1960s have been used in vaccines for the last 30 years. An Italian study identified the pres­ence of a complete, abnormal human genome of a male fetus in the MMRV vaccine. Some vaccine makers, in response to concerns by the Catholic church and other religious groups, have begun to phase out the use of human fetal cell lines in the production of vaccines.

Vaccines should be free of Radio-Frequency ID (RFID) bio-chips and nano-technology agents.

The introduction of bio-chips and nano-technology agent by vaccine is a new frontier being explored by tech companies and military research agencies such as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Claims are they would create a communi­cations interface between a person’s biology/physiology/psychology and outside technologies. No one knows the short or long-term effects.

Vaccine manufacturers should not have liability protection.

A 1986 act of Congress granting liability protection to vaccine makers creates profitable incentives to rush vaccines to market and ignore potential safety concerns.Vaccine makers need to bear the primary responsibility and financial liability for ensuring that their products are safe. Vaccine injuries and deaths occur every day. The government has paid out almost $4.5 billion to the vaccine-injured through its National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, while denying two-thirds of cases.

Learn more at childrenshealthdefense.org/warpspeed

1227 North Peachtree Pkwy, Suite 202, Peachtree City, GA 30269 childrenshealthdefense.org • 202-618-2477